14 July 2008

dairy-air: milk production sources exposed

You're in the dairy aisle, trying to figure out which milk to buy. You spot the organic label and think, I can trust this -- it's organic, it's better for me and the environment. And the cows are happily grazing in green pastures. Wrong again! That USDA Organic label is not always so forthcoming, especially in the world of dairy production.

Now you might be thinking, why is she bursting my milky bubble? I thought I had this organic, hormone- and antibiotic-free milk thing figured out. Yeah, me too. Until I started digging a little deeper into the manure pile of dairy greenwashing.

The biggest brands you might recognize in the supermarket milk game are Horizon Organic and Organic Valley. I had heard a couple of years ago that Horizon didn't have the lily white reputation they claimed to have, that they weren't any better than conventional because they sourced their milk from factory farms. So they've been off my list for a while.

But I thought I could trust Organic Valley, with their barefoot CEO reeking of humble beginnings and honest behavior. Boy did I fall for that one! Recent reports say Organic Valley decided to source from a 10,000 head cattle operation in Texas where "some" of their cows are exposed to pasture. Doesn't sound like a small-scale, sustainable family farm to me. Honestly, the news broke my butter-loving heart. And that CEO-sans-shoes, George Siemon, says,

"Sometimes you have to make compromises; that's just the nature of business," ... "I made the decision to buy the product, and I'm willing to take the heat." (source: The Capital Times)
Sorry, George, but that's not a compromise I would have made. I semi-admire Siemon's willingness to "take the heat," but what irks me is his lack of responsibility to his customers who actually care what they're feeding themselves and their families. (More at Grist)

Large-scale dairy production is neither healthy nor sustainable.
Like many things that seem reasonably priced on the sticker, factory farming poses hidden costs to society. Here are just a few (source: Union of Concerned Scientists):
  • Water pollution from manure runoff
  • Oxygen-depleted coastal regions (from runoff)
  • Air pollution from manure
  • Methane release from manure lagoons
  • Negative health impact on surrounding communities (plus the smell, egad!)
  • Antibiotic-resistant pathogens (like MRSA)
  • Grain subsidies
  • Pollution prevention subsidies
So which dairies can you trust?
One way to ensure your hard-earned buck is going toward better milk products is to visit your local farmer's market. There you can meet face-to-face with the farmers and ask them all about their practices. Many farms even encourage visits so you can see first hand where the stuff is coming from.

Find a farmer's market near you

No farmer's market in your area? Here are some small-scale dairy brands (and the products they offer) you may have seen in your supermarket:

And then there's...
Stonyfield, though recently under scrutiny due to dairy farm wages (and now majority owned by Groupe Danone), maintains their support for small-scale farms.

BAAaaa don't forget goat's milk!
I love goats and anything made with their milk. Goat's milk is said to have greater health benefits than cow's milk, like promoting better mineral absorption (e.g., calcium, magnesium). It's also more easily digested than moo milk. (Other health advantages here.)

Wanna try? Look for these goat-ee-licious brands:

More about large- vs small-scale farming:
If you've got the time, here's a comprehensive report from the Union of Concerned Scientists about the economic and environmental costs of CAFOs (confined animal feeding operations).

A great resource that's keeping organic farmers honest is the Cornucopia Institute, an independent watchdog organization that advocates small farming practices.

Endnote:
Everyone must be on the same dairy wavelength today, 'cause as I was writing this post, this came through from Manhattan User's Guide:

So let's see if we've got this straight: the Monsanto company produces a synthetic growth hormone called Posilac, used by some dairy farmers, which juices cows to produce more milk. Lots of people don't want this in their milk, for compelling reasons. Dairy farmers that do not use the recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH) almost invariably state that on their milk carton labels. You, the consumer, get useful info. But since the FDA would not allow Monsanto to ban rBGH labelling nationally, the dirtbags have been going state-by-state to pass legislation that would ban the labelling. They're now trying to do it in New York; they need to be stopped.

future wasteland

What will happen to the thousands of gas stations across the nation once renewable technology replaces the combustion engine? ZeroCarbonista proposes that they will be obsolete and thus become plots of wasted land. It brings to mind the nearly extinct drive-in movie theater, weeds busting through the cracks in the pavement where cars packed with necking teens and families once parked.

But what about all of the antiquated cars? Will there be an opportunity to hack our rides, swapping out the petro-driven engine for a battery-operated one? Or will there be an influx of dated machinery, destined for the scrap heap? Let's hope we have the foresight to find a new purpose for the old machines, and their fueling stations, when the time comes.

[Treehugger's take here]

13 July 2008

energy boost

I'm feeling a little lethargic today, but here are some promising developments in renewables to boost my energy, via Gizmodo.

Windows open up to improved solar energy
Engineers at MIT have developed windows that collect sunlight and concentrate the energy at their edges for more efficient (and cheaper) energy capture. They came up with the idea after thinking the same principles from laser and organic light-emitting diode technology -- where different dyes are used to absorb and transport light -- could apply to gathering solar energy. So in the future, instead of having to pile solar panels on your roof or in your yard, your seemingly ordinary windows will collect the energy. [Physorg via Gizmodo]

An image is worth a thousand wind farms
Global satellite imaging from NASA map out where the winds gust strongest, making it easier to determine where wind farms should be placed. The plan is to implement offshore wind farms, floating in the open ocean, which are less impactful on the environment.
[NASA via Treehugger via Gizmodo]

12 July 2008

shea butter wonder

I am an avid label reader. I peruse labels on clothing to determine their origin and content, on food to be sure there are no offensive additives, and on beauty products to avoid harmful or polluting chemicals.

So I was delighted yesterday, after getting my haircut, that the stuff my hairdresser was putting in my hair had just a few simple ingredients. Organic shea butter, rosemary, lavender, and bergamot -- that's all that's inside the lovely Amikole Hair Butter. And it's made right here in NYC.

This natural wonder is versatile, too. Want to tame fly-aways or give your hair a bit of texture? A little dab is all you need. Use a little more to create a wet look. Massage it into your scalp and wash out for a therapeutic treatment.

Get some for yourself here. Or at Ultra Salon, 123 Essex St, NYC.

11 July 2008

the future of energy determines our fate

At times, I can be rather impressionable. My outlook on the state of the world can dramatically shift depending on what information I'm exposed to. Right now I'm on an optimistic upswing. I've been reading the Economist's special energy report (June 21-27, 2008) and it's stirring hope in me that all isn't lost. Let me explain.

The biggest of big business is jumping on the renewable energy band wagon. GE, historically one of the biggest polluters of our time,[1] is in the wind energy business (the corporate spiel here). GM, makers of the most gas-guzzlingest of SUVs (Hummer, Escalade, Suburban), is putting out a plug-in car (the Volt) for 2010. And they just closed 4 SUV plants and may be selling their Hummer division. (More about the closing plants and future of GM's small cars here.)

The world is finally waking up to the fact that fossil fuels are a finite, and destructive, resource.[2] And if it weren't for the steadily climbing price of oil, the world wouldn't be scrambling to discover the next energy breakthrough. We'd all be continuing at breakneck speed to destroy the planet, sucking up the oil and burning up the coal and forgetting all about climate change.

The future of renewable energy is glaringly bright (grab your shades). And it's not just solar that's shining the way. There's wind, of course, which may have the potential to power 15% of America by 2020.[3] Cellulosic and algael biofuels (a hell of a lot more efficient and sustainable than corn ethanol), improved nuclear, geothermal, wave energy, fuel cell and plug-in cars. There are so many opportunities to develop a mix of sources to feed our addiction to power.

The shift to renewables will create a market explosion to surpass the dotcom boom (and bust), the rise of silicon valley, or any other tech sector boom because our life as we know it depends on it. The expansion of this industry in response to rising oil demand and prices leaves me feeling optimistic.

But tomorrow I could read about how the polar ice caps are all melting faster than we thought and we're all going to hell in a handbasket. Or get bummed out about the administration's plans for offshore drilling in protected waters (which by the way is a big waste of time and natural resources). But today, I'll bask in the sunny optimism of a renewable energy future.

[1] A little support on this claim, from:

[2] I'm burying the ugliness of fossil fuels here: wars, human rights issues, oil spills, cancer and poor air quality from coal-fired power plants (coal miners and everyone else), greenhouse gases, coal soot polluting arctic snow speeding its melt, mountaintop mining, peak oil.

[3] Source: Economist. The Future of Energy: Trade Winds. June 19, 2008.

10 July 2008

clothing retailers waking up to their impact?

In line with today's theme of responsible apparel comes news that some of the big retailers are planning to meet to discuss their role in the environment. Over 3 days in Shanghai, China, representatives from the companies -- JC Penney, Levi Strauss, Marks and Spencer (UK), and Polo Ralph Lauren -- are pow-wowing in regards to the impact of dyeing in textile manufacturing.

More about the meeting here.

Read about how China is holding manufacturers accountable for their polluting ways here.

[Image: Manufacturing #7: Textile Mill. Edward Burtynsky, The China Series]

eco happy feet

And what about shoes? Here's a roundup of some cute shoes that won't hurt your purse or the earth.

Shore Thing by Patagonia
$59 at PlanetShoes.com
(other colors available)
Patagonia Shore Thing Sandals - Taupe - Women

Ikebana by El Naturalista
$130 at PlanetShoes.com
(other colors available)
El Naturalista Ikebana N126 Sandals - Brown - Women


Dobamo by Terra Plana
$110 at Kaight
(also in red, more views here)










Gizeh by Birkenstock

$69 at PlanetShoes.com
(other colors available)
Birkenstock Gizeh Birko-Flor Sandals - Black Patent, Brown, Silver, Red Patent - Women


Penny Wedge by Form & Fauna

Was $285/Now $213.75 at Kaight













Aphrodite by Earth

Now $54 at PlanetShoes.com
Earth Aphrodite Sandals - Key Lime, Pewter - Women


Doll by Terra Plana

Now $77.50 at Shoes.com
(also in black)
Womens Doll

Toepaz by Simple

$74.99 at Shoes.com
(other colors available)
Womens Toepaz

Elara by Earth

$88 at PlanetShoes.com

Earth Elara - NEW for SPRING Sandals - Almond, Black, Rosso, White - Women

Grass by Terra Plana
$140 at Terra Plana
(other colors available)

on sale: eco-fashion

I'm usually willing to pay a little more for fashion that claims to be sustainable. But for those of us on a budget, buying fashionable eco-friendly clothes is not always an option. So ladies, here's your chance to get some good deals on quality eco-duds. I've done a round-up of some of the sales going on at eco-fashion web shops.

Tops ($70 and under)
Piped tunic by Sustainable Collective
(bamboo/organic cotton/spandex)
Was $94/Now $50

[Fashion Ethic]








Cassidy Camisole by Edun
Was $125/Now $65
[The Green Loop]









Crisp blouse by Kelly B
(organic cotton/spandex)
Sale price $70
[BTC Elements]









Half-sleeve hoodie by Stewart+Brown
(organic cotton)
Sale price $42
[BTC Elements]









Bottoms
($95 and under)

Hemp trouser pant by Ryann
Was $128/Now $95
[Fashion Ethic]










Beach shorts by Loomstate
(organic cotton)
Was $129/Now $64
[The Green Loop]









Tutor skirt by Loomstate
(organic cotton denim)
Was $129/Now $65
[The Green Loop]










Wide leg pant by Habitude
(organic cotton twill)
Was $176/Now $90
[The Green Loop]








Dresses
(under $170)
Sexy soy halter dress by Anna Cohen
Originally $281/Now $168.60
[Green with Glamour]









"Alison" pleated dress by Sublet
(30% organic cotton, 67% bamboo, 3% spandex)
Originally $242/Now $130
[Fashion Ethic]








Tularosa dress by Loyale
(bamboo/cotton jersey blend)
Originally $160/Now $145
[Bohmo]








Pinstripe jumper by Bahar Shapar
(organic cotton)
Was $270/Now $135
[Kaight]









Aurora dress by Perfectly Imperfect
(organic cotton)
Not on sale, but reasonably priced at $130
[Green with Glamour]







Leigh dress by Kelly B
(bamboo)
Not on sale, but reasonably priced at $113
[Green with Glamour]

09 July 2008

what's going down your shower drain?

Petrochemicals, parabens, chemical surfactants, these are just a few of the things that are washed out of our hair and down the drain when we use conventional shampoo. Most of us don't think twice about it, bye-bye chemicals! I can't see you!

I started thinking more about these things a few years ago. What am I washing down the drain? Where is it going? Well it's not really going away. These toxins end up in our waterways and cycle back to us in our tap water.

Not to mention the direct effects of some of these ingredients when you're actually using them on a daily basis.

In light of all this, I'm so happy to have found Max Green Alchemy. They make hair care and other beauty products with good stuff in them -- no petrochemicals, no sodium laureth/laurel sulfate (skin irritants), and no parabens. I swear by Max's shampoo and conditioner. I won't use anything else. They have a nice herbal scent and leave my hair shiny and bouncy. I introduced Max to a friend of mine who does beauty product advertising, and her industry colleagues immediately took notice of her lovely locks. So Max isn't just eco-conscious, he makes you feel beautiful, too.

08 July 2008

why smoking stinks

[First I'd like to say to my auntie, if this post upsets you, sorry! I'm only thinking of your health and well being -- that's all.]

(Image: Chris Jordan. Cigarette butts, 2005. 5 x 10 feet)

Ok, now let's get down to it.

Aside from the obvious: cancer, emphysema, COPD, brittle bones, yellow teeth, yellow nails, stinky breath, smelly hair, and stinky everything-one-owns, there's the health of the world to consider.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), tobacco is the second major cause of death in the world. What? That shocked even me. (More alarming facts about tobacco from WHO here.) What other evil do cigarettes impose on the planet?

Tobacco poisons land and waterways.
Large amounts of pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers are used in the farming of tobacco. In the US, one estimate puts yearly use of pesticide on tobacco in the US at over 25 million pounds. Some of these toxic pesticides are linked to birth defects, cancer, and/or nerve damage.[1] Naturally, what's put into the soil soon runs off into waterways, poisoning lakes, streams, and eventually the ocean.

Today, like many other industries, tobacco production is moving out of the US to developing nations. These countries don't have the same environmental regulations as the US, so the ecological toll could be greater.

Tobacco production contributes to deforestation.
Trees are cut down to build tobacco curing barns and to fuel the curing process.[2] There's also the paper the tobacco is rolled in to consider. It's estimated that one tree is sacrificed for every 300 cigarettes (~10.5 packs) produced. [3] We all know by now that deforestation is a major contributor to climate change.

Tobacco crops also eat into land that would be viable for farming food.

Unextinguished cigarettes cause forest fires.

And the butt...
The most littered trash in America (and some say the planet) are cigarette butts. While estimates vary on how long it takes for them to break down (from 10 months to 12 years), the plastic toxins in the butts never go away. They find there way into waterways and can adversely affect (read: kill) aquatic micro-organisms at the bottom of the food chain. And if we remember anything from grade school science class, what happens to the creatures at the bottom of the food chain affects us all.

So how can you or someone you care about quit smoking?
I know people who've quit cold turkey, using the patch, taking Chantix, or reading a book (like this one by Allen Carr, which gets a ton of good reviews). There are several online resources to help kick the habit. Here are a few:
In New York City, dial 311 to get free nicotine patches.

Sources:

1. US Geological Survey, Pesticide National Synthesis Project. National Totals by Crop and Compound. March 1998. In: Pesticide Action Network.
2. Geist, HJ. Global assessment of deforestation related to tobacco farming. Tobacco Control. 1999;8:18-28.
3. Muller, M. Tobacco in the Third World: Tommorrow's Epidemic? London: War on Want, 1976.

Additional sources:

afternoon eco news

07 July 2008

plastic pile

I have a confession. I have a large collection of plastic that can't be recycled in NYC. Mostly #6 (PS or polystyrene) and some #5 (polypropylene) objects are piling up in our "office" (aka, second bedroom; aka, junk room). Coffee cup lids, containers that held mushrooms, yogurt containers -- I can't get myself to throw them away. I have a big project in mind for them, but yesterday I was thinking, maybe there's a place I can send this stuff to be recycled.

And I found out today, there is! Thanks to Ideal Bite, I found out that Park Slope Food Co-op in Brooklyn will be happy to take my #5s and some of my number #4s (although these aren't as common) to send to Recycline. As I've mentioned before, they have a partnership with this maker of Preserve products. So the plastics that were destined to go to the dump (or the ocean) are now the stuff of toothbrushes, razors, and other household goods.

Now what to do with those #6s?

made in my backyard

It's nice to see when things are made close to home. While I can't be sure of the origins of their components, at least I know these finished products don't have far to ship. Check out some quality Made-in-Brooklyn goods courtesy of, funnily enough, Manhattan User's Guide.


And a few more Brooklyn-made goods: